Quote:3dfx design chips. Hercules do not, and never have.
Which still doesn't change the fact that Hercules, not ATI ushered in major changes to the market.
Quote:I never said 3dfx make voodoo1 or voodoo2 cards, who did?
This was not part of the discussion.
It's called "illustrating a point"
You contend that Hercules contribution wasn't important since they didn't make chips, on the other hand does that mean 3dfx wasn't important since they didn't sell boards till 1999 when they purchased STB?
So then by your own yardstick it's Motorola that initally revolutionised the market since they provided the graphics chips to Hercules... years before ATI was even a company.
So by your own logic, Motorola not ATI was first?
Quote:"3dfx revolutionized the graphics market." Your words, put into the context that their chips revolutionised the market ... because of the chips they provided.
Correct, 3dfx did indeed revolutionize the market in regards to graphics, 3D graphics to be precise.
Quote:Ati created the graphics market .. because of the chips they provided. Hercules produced such cards using the vendors technology.
Hercules was selling cards before ATI was even a company.
Hercules became the gold standard of video cards at the time and still had a reputation as a giant in the industry right up till the late 90's.
ATI didn't do anything of import till the 8500 was released. Before that they had poor cards and worse drivers and only stayed in business by selling cheap cards to OEM's.
Quote:So this confirms that nVIDIA and ATI do and will have their loyal fans then?
The point I was trying to make.
You suggested going to a fanboy site and looking for fanboys, which I'll find no shortage of. I suggested going to a site with far less bias and see what the attitude of a larger number of PC hardware enthusiasts is.
Big difference.
Fanboys make up a tiny number of the market, if they had a larger impact I'd wager 3dfx would still be around since it can be argued that 3dfx had some of the most vocal fans.
Wasn't enough to save them was it?
Quote:I don't see the point you are trying to make here. Initially, you state that such forums have 'a very large number of people who do not care who supplies the hardware as long as it works' and then there is 'no shortage of people with opinions, including the site owners'.
Which is it to be?
You indicated the forums would be not biased since those sites review hardware, if you had taken the time to at least look through the forums contents you would see this isn't the case AT ALL.
The forums are public areas and open to any posting in regards to hardware, good or bad.
If you spent any time at all page through the HardOCP site you would note that the editor of this very well known and successful site is very baised about some products and makes no bones about it and why when the subjects come up.