osckhar wrote on 11.06.12 at 12:14:00:Yes, it could be but check the picture. If second vsa-100 is the blue row and it is sequential. The space between blue rows should be more width since that the second row blue would correspond to the first vsa-100 now.
It should be
1
blue
3
4
1
blue
But for the image seems:
1
blue
3
4
Blue
Honestly, at the beginning I thought the same. But actually paying more attention to the image, it looks like the space between two blue rows is too much for being like that, but also too little for being like I said.
Oh well, I can't say, it's too difficult only looking at picture. It was only a supposition.
EDIT: BTW, still looking at picture. If we are assuming that the first black row is a single row rendered by the first VSA, the last black row at the bottom is wider than the first row on top, but thinner than the rows between the blue ones. So that would suggest:
1°
2° - (blue)
3°
4°
1°
2° - (blue)
...
...
2° - (blue)
3°
4° (
since it has to end even)
So, each VSA renders 12 rows. It also depends by the resolution...is there no way to know what res the card was attempt to run?
EDIT: I'm trying to figure out if could be plausuble. Assuming 1024x768 res, it should look like this:
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/3668/v56ksli.png
Home
