@Boiu_Andrei

This the last time I "clear up" your weird statements.
Refrain from making them in the future, or face consequences.
Read up on those basics > then post, and not the other way around... [/quote]

I agree with you Blackhawk, Andrei has improved, in quantity and quality, the discussion in this forum, and I have learned a lot with his insights.  Falconfly needs someone to make him throw off all his knowledge, he...he...he...
Bye!

Shall I make a return? I don't know, I am still thinking at this aspect...
But why not stick a light up again?

What was the first game that used multi-texturing?
Quake2.

What can multi-texturing do? Show more realistic objects, use of bump-mapping effects, transparency, chrome (shiny) objects... You can continue the list.

Even if some of you know how single texturing is, let's try and see how much can a mutli-texturing environment affect the performance on a multi-texturing capable board, and on a single-texturing capable board.

We will take this games as a benchmark:
NFS3, Quake3, Unreal Tournament and GTA3.

Say how much you think multi-texturing use is enhancing each game, where you see it clearly, and how much performance you loose when multi-texturing is used on both a capable and on a non-capable single pass multi-texturing board (eg. Voodoo3 as opsed to Voodoo Banshee and other cards might follow)...

Hee hee hee  

Yup, sure am, I also own all them re-mastered in THX/DTS.

If you want to talk further on this, please start another thread for it so we don't confuse anyone reading this particular post.

Quote:

Wonder if there is anyone interested in continuing this topic. With "paulpsomiadis" and "Black_out", imediately starting a new discussion, and also because of the fact that the last post regarding multi-texturing was not continued by anyone...

Is there seriously anyone interested in continuing this topic in the same way as before???

Mister ElvisAlive:

From were did you draw that strange conclusion that this topic was about V6000?
Again the story with the MotoGP. What is so amazing at that game anyway?
Overclocking, overclocking, wonder if it is anywhere else interesting for you, or worth...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To Admin (Falconly or Patience):

At what can a topic get to when the topic has get to more than 4 pages: nonsense.
As a very rare attitude and request for admin, I would recommend this topic to be closed, because it is already gone too far from where it started. This way it would somehow preserve what is still connected to the point.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have to add to this, the run of "FR - Poem to a horse", available on Bdreams website, although it is poossible to be found on others. Running with all the settings at maximum on an Nforce2 IGP, the quality IS questionable. One of the things mostly noticed is the text, that everywhere is blurred. In the credits zone at the end of the demo, the text is nearly too blured to be read.

On contrast, even if the ProSavageDDR is not pushing so much FPS (the demo is using lots of polygons, and lots of textures at other time, pushing the fill-rate to the limit of the chip), the quality is the very best. Everything looks clear and sharp, a very enjoyable graphics experience. And for the onest that are having doubts, yes, the Nforce was set with max Aniso, sharp textures... Still it can't beat, in quality, the ProSavage DDR, who didn't even had Aniso capability.