Quote:Hmm, not sure if I agree
, it would have at least been a great gesture of good will if Nvidia had decided to pick up the tab for supporting 3dfx cards.
Why? They didn't pay for that, no sense throwing money after something you didn't agree on.
The support for the cards was squarely left in 3dfx's hands and they choose to abandon us. They say the higher ups in the company were well taken care of in the buy out, I doubt the rank and file 3dfx people were treated or felt the same way.
Based on how Nvidia has acted in the past and the fact members of the 3dfx board were well compensated it would not surprise me a bit if Nvidia had a few "inside" people on the 3dfx board.
People were paid off, pure and simple for 3dfx to fold, bonuses for everyone!
Examine my theory for flaws please.
Quote:At the very least they could have released the then latest driver source code and allowed the 3dfx community to fend for themselves.
Have to protect their (purchased) software rights- Releasing the source opens up all sorts of fair use problems. Far far more simple and less headaches to not release and and let the former 3dfx end users to twist in the wind for good measure.
I'm surprised threatening letters from lawyers have not been issued in regards to the source code, but then again if they had after 4 years it would have just stired up a lot of anti-nvidia feelings.
Quote:I also believe that 3dfx was in such bad shape financialy that they would'nt risk the sale/acquisition over making driver support a legal condition of sale. Nvidia had them by the balls !
Or simply paid off the right people, again it was a smart move on their part. Why have the support issues for something you didn't sell and make a profit on?
Quote: If it had or was close to taping out and there's a few prototypes, it could'nt have been to far away from a public release ?
Rampage was only on the first revision silicon, for a point of reference I think the VSA-100 had three and still needed one more but was rushed out the door to make some sales.