http://www.3dfx.cz/articles/rev.htm

http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=717&whichpage=1

That's the topic where part of the revisions came from.
I doubt there are notable errors in there, it's based on real cards from those people.

Velocity 200- Sorry if it has a sticker that states "V3-1000" it's not a Velocity 200.

Voodoo 4 "4000" There is no VSA-100 "4000"

They don't have a single "week 30, 2000" Voodoo 4 prototype listed of which a few dozen are floating about.

V5-6000 - No 0700 listed, no 2600 listed, no 3900 listed

Rampage- date wrong but at least in gray indicating as such.

This is just the stuff that leaps out at me after a quick look.

I agree with what someone stated- There are some errors with the CZ site BUT more often then not they get it right so that is cool.

Sometimes it's hard to find a source to verifiy some piece of info, some folks will run with it others will not.

I tend to not since information flies around the internet at light speed and once a rumor or "stated fact" is started its difficult to undo.

Well ok I see that it is nothing uncommon...

Speaking of these listings and v3k AGP... I've got an early rev. C
1699 with Siemens 6ns ram