the Voodoo5 6000 performance is even faster than a GeForce3 Ti200 in most cases, and some times it can beat a GeForce3 classic.
I read a thread about it over here:
here it beats a GeForce3 classic in 16 Bit colours with the game Evolva @ 1600x 1200 x16!but at 32bit it can keep up, so it would beat the Ti200 with ease.:
here a test at expandeble at 1024 x 768 x16 and x32, it would indeed perform like a GF3 Ti200, the Ti200 isn't listed, but it would come across it, the Gf3 ti200 was faster than a GF2 U but slower than a GF3, so the V56K would come across towards that.
In Quake3Arena the V56K is faster @ 1204x768x16 than a GF3 but in 32Bit the F3 just scales it , @ 1600x1200 the GF3 is slightly faster, to me the performance is equal.
here a test of Q3A in 1024 x 768 x 16 & 32:
and here @ 1600x 1200 x 16&32:
Jedi Knight II Jedi Outcast the GF3 get's it's prize the V56K performs well though:
but the tablles turn in Serious Sam the Second Encounter, the V56K would perform like a GF3Ti500 in this game, rather impressive!
so the V56K would of made it rather well, it may yet have saved 3dfx afterall.
here is where I got the infor from, I thought it was rather interesting to Post:
A Fallen Titan's Final Glory, Part I: Setting the Stage:
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=412 A Fallen Titan's Final Glory, Part II: The Voodoo5 6000 Reviewed:
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=413A Fallen Titan's Final Glory, Part III: What Might Have Been.:
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=414I know not all info is correct on the further cards themselves, but the benchmarks are perfect, and the history is roughly correct, but yet again a very nice info source.