Welcome, Guest. Please Login 3dfx Archive
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
XGI Volari (Read 461 times)
Aqua
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 4
Gender: male
XGI Volari
09.12.03 at 07:45:54
 
There is a great test of the XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra on this http://www.hardware-tweaker.de/HTML/Home_4/Overclocking/Artikel_Teil1/XGI_Volari... page.

An english review will be come soon there!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FalconFly
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


3dfx Archivist

Posts: 2445
5335N 00745E
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #1 - 09.12.03 at 09:41:44
 
Hmm...

Unfortunately, it currently doesn't look good for XGI there.

I'd say let's wait a few weeks so they can polish their Drivers.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Micha
Senior Member
****
Offline


Got milk?

Posts: 317
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #2 - 09.12.03 at 12:41:51
 
nevertheless, it's a good beginning..just a first step. let's see what their next gen boards can handle (if they'll earn enough from the first gen)
Back to top
 

AMD Athlon XP Thorton 2400+/2GHz (256KB L2, FSB DDR266MHz) @ Barton 2800+/2.083GHz (512KB L2, FSB DDR333MHz), HIS Radeon 9800Pro, Kingston 768MB PC2700 DDR-RAM (CL 2-3-3-7), Asus A7V8X-X, Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS, Seagate 160GB 7200rpm ATA100 HDD, be quiet! 400Watt PSU, Windows XP Pro MCE05
WWW  
IP Logged
 
paulpsomiadis
God Member
*****
Offline


-=3Dfx still rox!=-

Posts: 2011
Newcastle U.K.
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #3 - 09.12.03 at 15:54:05
 
Hmm...link seems to be down at this time? ???

Dang it! I wanna see that review! Angry

Oh well, I'll try again later... Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

-=To MOD or not to MOD, that is a DUMB question - just MOD it!=-&&&&+May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.+
themadhaxor  
IP Logged
 
Blazkowicz
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 132
france
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #4 - 09.12.03 at 20:23:33
 
this card  seems to be a new FX5800 Ultra : kick ass in directX 7 but impotent in Pixel Shader 2.0
PS 1.x are'nt tested but maybe they suck too
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FalconFly
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


3dfx Archivist

Posts: 2445
5335N 00745E
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #5 - 09.12.03 at 20:36:51
 
Still, it's going to be an exotic card, maybe I'll buy one nevertheless for my Collection (despite possible performance issues)...

..but for now, certainly not at the current Retail Price.

Given enough time, though, I'm confident that XGI will put its big VRAM bandwidth to a quite good use. The rest is only the right placement into the right market segment (pricing).

...we could need a 3rd player in the Graphics Market.

KyroX isn't on the horizon yet, and DeltaChrome may take some time to come around.
Back to top
« Last Edit: 09.12.03 at 20:37:41 by FalconFly »  
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Andrew Boiu
Senior Member
****
Offline


LDE-BDreams

Posts: 267
LDE-BDreams
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #6 - 10.12.03 at 09:43:35
 
However, as I've heard, the card is using waaaaay too much power, given it's technology (microns) and actual performance. Perhaps for some users, having a secondary 400W ATX power source is not a funny thing (the Volari is not using 400W, but who knows what might follow)...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Micha
Senior Member
****
Offline


Got milk?

Posts: 317
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #7 - 11.12.03 at 14:21:44
 
Quote:
However, as I've heard, the card is using waaaaay too much power, given it's technology (microns) and actual performance. Perhaps for some users, having a secondary 400W ATX power source is not a funny thing (the Volari is not using 400W, but who knows what might follow)...


Remember: the same discussion rose up when the Voodoo5 was released...only some recognized the power connection was implemented to relieve the mainboard's power supply. i bet you won't need both connectors on the volari when your mainboard's strong enough.
Back to top
« Last Edit: 11.12.03 at 14:23:39 by Micha »  

AMD Athlon XP Thorton 2400+/2GHz (256KB L2, FSB DDR266MHz) @ Barton 2800+/2.083GHz (512KB L2, FSB DDR333MHz), HIS Radeon 9800Pro, Kingston 768MB PC2700 DDR-RAM (CL 2-3-3-7), Asus A7V8X-X, Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS, Seagate 160GB 7200rpm ATA100 HDD, be quiet! 400Watt PSU, Windows XP Pro MCE05
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Andrew Boiu
Senior Member
****
Offline


LDE-BDreams

Posts: 267
LDE-BDreams
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #8 - 12.12.03 at 10:45:00
 
Given the fact that a P4 is already using 100W+ power, it is obviously that you will need a separate power connector for Volary. Also, if someone noted, the Radeon 9700 pro, is using a separate ATX power connector for the consumption it needs.

So, the separate connector will continue to be a reality, unless all the motherboards will be designed to supply and regulate 300W+ power. It will make the boards twice as costly, and perhaps 1/4 bigger than they are now. Actually no use for making "strong" boards to cope with the big consumption of Video cards. Keep a free AT 5/12V connector free. You'll never know when you might actually need one!
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
paulpsomiadis
God Member
*****
Offline


-=3Dfx still rox!=-

Posts: 2011
Newcastle U.K.
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #9 - 12.12.03 at 12:06:14
 
Heh, just don't use too many of 'em or you'll kill your PSU! Shocked

Ooh lookit, there's funny smoke coming from the PSU! Roll Eyes

Heheheheh! Grin
Back to top
 

-=To MOD or not to MOD, that is a DUMB question - just MOD it!=-&&&&+May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.+
themadhaxor  
IP Logged
 
Micha
Senior Member
****
Offline


Got milk?

Posts: 317
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #10 - 12.12.03 at 13:21:38
 
right, damn...but i use a 'be quiet!' 400W PSU and this one doesn't care! *lol*
the volari ultra v8 duo uses (2d/3d engine) 55W/130W, right? that's pretty much, but i won't care if you're not using a P4..  Grin
Back to top
« Last Edit: 12.12.03 at 13:22:54 by Micha »  

AMD Athlon XP Thorton 2400+/2GHz (256KB L2, FSB DDR266MHz) @ Barton 2800+/2.083GHz (512KB L2, FSB DDR333MHz), HIS Radeon 9800Pro, Kingston 768MB PC2700 DDR-RAM (CL 2-3-3-7), Asus A7V8X-X, Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS, Seagate 160GB 7200rpm ATA100 HDD, be quiet! 400Watt PSU, Windows XP Pro MCE05
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Andrew Boiu
Senior Member
****
Offline


LDE-BDreams

Posts: 267
LDE-BDreams
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #11 - 15.12.03 at 10:14:52
 
This whole discussion about power usage, brings to memory the VIA C3 processors, which use 11W for 866Mhz. Even if the C3 is using no SSE or 3DNow!Extended, it is amazing how it can be that efficient, when a P3 at that frequency (which were actually less power consuming at the same frequency as the P4 at 1.4Ghz), is using estimatedly 40W.

If the CPU's and GPU's were build as efficient as possible, and given the fact that actually the thing that really counts today(as it counted yesterday), is still pure Mhz power, no matter what "superset" is added: SSE,MMX, 3DNow.
A fast enough CPU, with lots of cache, would cope amazingly well, and it must be a winner at least for laptops. But even there you see no C3 and no ProSavageDDR on the specification.
Speaking trully, I guess noone bothers too much about consumption, as long as power supplies are manufactured to take the load. The "green" (ecology/efficiency/environment) spirit is obviously kind of dead anyway...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
FalconFly
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


3dfx Archivist

Posts: 2445
5335N 00745E
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #12 - 15.12.03 at 10:40:21
 
Well, that Efficiency (in the example of the VIA C3 Design) unfortunately had a price :

Performance

The Performance of the VIA C3 CPU (given the MHz) is absolutely underground. That still leaves it Power-efficent and good enough for basic Office Productivity, but for anything beyond that it is outperformed even by 3-4 year old Processors, running at much lower MHz.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Micha
Senior Member
****
Offline


Got milk?

Posts: 317
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #13 - 15.12.03 at 16:44:52
 
Quote:
A fast enough CPU, with lots of cache, would cope amazingly well, and it must be a winner at least for laptops.


have in mind that cache is the cpu component which produces most heat --> the more cache you got, the hotter your cpu runs...
Back to top
 

AMD Athlon XP Thorton 2400+/2GHz (256KB L2, FSB DDR266MHz) @ Barton 2800+/2.083GHz (512KB L2, FSB DDR333MHz), HIS Radeon 9800Pro, Kingston 768MB PC2700 DDR-RAM (CL 2-3-3-7), Asus A7V8X-X, Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS, Seagate 160GB 7200rpm ATA100 HDD, be quiet! 400Watt PSU, Windows XP Pro MCE05
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Andrew Boiu
Senior Member
****
Offline


LDE-BDreams

Posts: 267
LDE-BDreams
Gender: male
Re: XGI Volari
Reply #14 - 17.12.03 at 10:28:12
 
Quote:
have in mind that cache is the cpu component which produces most heat --> the more cache you got, the hotter your cpu runs...


Use of a large L3 cache (1 or 2Mb), on the motherboard, that was the main idea, not a large on-die CPU cache.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print