Quote:ati X1650 seems to be ok!
Yes, but don't just look at the charts - read the article given completely:
"
The availability of the Radeon X1650XT is a worry given that samples were available two months ago when the product was launched, yet retail versions are still very difficult to come by. Furthermore, ATI has slapped a MSRP of $150 on the cards, though it is said that for at least the first few weeks the X1650XT will not meet this price tag. If this is the case then it could certainly be a matter of too little too late from ATI, particularly given the fact that the X1650XT is not DirectX 10 compliant."
And You've mentioned x1550 and x1650 (lower price range) - I'd dare to say, you thought on x1650pro and not XT? If so, then look at this:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html?modelx=33&model1=529&model2=590&char...http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html?modelx=33&model1=529&model2=590&char...and if you dislike a comparison to an Nvidia card, take a look at this:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html?modelx=33&model1=575&model2=590&char...Comparison between x800XT AGP ( 34FPS ) and x1650pro (20 FPS)
You can check the same out for Oblivion:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html?modelx=33&model1=575&model2=590&char...or, 7600GT vs x1650pro:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html?modelx=33&model1=529&model2=590&char...Anyway, I know what I'm saying - somebody would like to belive that x16x0XT is better then x800XT, but it just isn't. Forget about shaders. 40% faster? Only in 3Dmark and only XT version.
Quote:how ever a X1650XT is about 40% faster than a X850 XT PE AGP
This is what I call, a good dream
Here's what I mean 39 FPS (x850 XT PE) vs 29 FPS (x1650XT):
PLEASE NOTE:
x1650 was run on: - Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.66GHz), - Corsair PC2-6400 2GB DDR2, ASUS P5W DH Deluxe (Intel 975X)
x850 on : AMD Athlon64 3200+, 2x 512 MB Micron DDR 333MHz CL 2.5 3-3-6, MSI K8T Neo
So, undoubtebly x1650 was favoured in the rest of hardware and still it loses. x850 is cca 35% faster then x1650XT 8)