@ Falconfly
It depends on how you read my posts, since they were informative to the R600 as other launched ATi cards as comparrance tests results.
Since there were some off topic posts placed i donīt mind that I mean it happens everywhere, right ?
But if you want me to remove the unwanted stuff please tell me which ones and really I donīt mind.
Do keep in mind that the Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB is aimed at the GeForce 8800GTS models:
Quote: .......
Not bad for beta drivers eh?
And not against the 8800GTX as most do think about and that the drivers can only get better.
the HD 2900XT 1024MB is aimed at the GTX model as for the Ultra. that one will release soon and heh it wonīt have such a delay as the R600 did you are totally right there.
Most of my posts were informative about the R600 so therefore so many some were defensive since there were many NV versus ATi posts in my topic again and pro NV posts shouldn.t be placed in an ATi topic the whole idea of it was to discuss the R600 and what lies beyond it but since there were quite alot of ATi uses I changed it to an ATi news & discussion topic which was a more sensable idea.
but spam noway hozay wrong there bud.
I didnīt post links from warez sites , I didnīt show pro ATi behavior against anti NV things and so on that would trigger flame wars, which isnīt the idea just posted news as news blogs of ATiīs new chip the R600 as comparences of it compared to that of the competitor the 8800 GTS just to compare the differences in i most tests the HD 2900XT is faster but indeewdly not worth the wait I totally agree the drivers are indeedly still crappy they should of been alot better than they are now, the architechture of the R600 does look nice 4c 64 Stream Processors + 512Bit 512MB GDDR3 but it doesnīt show it true prommissed power but for 340 euroīs it is a bang for the buck compared to the 8800GTS qua price performance but nor performance per watt which is the main problem people face, but a High end gamers rather looks at the price performance factor where the HD 2900XT really succeeds.
but even I am skipping it since it sucks far too much power, my advice is skip this one and go for R650 which is baked on 65nm and will use less half the power flow than of the R600.
So itīs not as dark as many see it, read the reliable revies of users that have the card and about 14 people of the GoT dutch ATi forum have the HD 2900XT and they are very pleased of itīs performance for what you pay for it but they do relise when FSAA + AF + HDR is enabled the performance drop is pretty big but the minimal fps is higher than that of a GTS as a GTX in many cases so even with that it isnīt as bad as many reviews make it look like
I heard it from people I know and trust which I rather believe than some strange reviewer.
But yeaps I agree the power consumption is very bad heh norries there.
But about your thing about Spam, sorry mate couldnīt find any spam posts okay there was some confusion on page 3 but that wasnīt the reason to close this place nor was it, since you mentioned that yourself on page 5
Quote:Sorry, but I see no reason to cancel this discussion that way.
Opinions are there to be shared and naturally differ. No reason to lock anything.
Everyone knows Obi likes ATI (so do I), and everyone knows that many others do not. Nothing to get exited about IMHO, that's plain normal (?)
The only thing some
may throw at others might be a bit of fanboy-ism, but that's not a crime (remember most of us were that way with 3dfx, many still are, so why not with ATI or NVidia ? )
Home
