Welcome, Guest. Please Login 3dfx Archive
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
difference in performance for 5500PCI? (Read 1986 times)
osckhar
God Member
*****
Offline


www.3Dfx.es

Posts: 812
SPAIN
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #30 - 03.04.14 at 15:17:28
 
@ultima,

Yes, for sure. Smiley

Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Steven67
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


recent 3dfx enthusiast

Posts: 26
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #31 - 03.04.14 at 22:10:59
 

Test for Oschkar V5500 @166 mhz
Driver XP Amigamerlin 3.1 R11


...
Back to top
« Last Edit: 03.04.14 at 22:16:56 by Steven67 »  
 
IP Logged
 
osckhar
God Member
*****
Offline


www.3Dfx.es

Posts: 812
SPAIN
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #32 - 04.04.14 at 12:03:57
 
Excellent! This afternoon I will post my test.

Thanks,
Oscar.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
osckhar
God Member
*****
Offline


www.3Dfx.es

Posts: 812
SPAIN
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #33 - 05.04.14 at 11:25:57
 
ASUS RAMPAGE EXTREME SOCKET 775
AGP3.3 ADAPTER @66MHz
V5-5500 AGP @166MHz


...

Seems C2D @3.3GHz makes fly the V5-5500 AGP. Now we should test V5 in some GLIDE/OpenGL games where T&L is not emulated by CPU. Here we will have more realist FPS.

- Oscar.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Steven67
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


recent 3dfx enthusiast

Posts: 26
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #34 - 05.04.14 at 17:21:07
 
Your Agp 3.3 adapter seems to be efficient, no problem.

The 3dm2001SE is a monothread bench very depending of the CPU frequency (and core power). I tested this when comparing A64 core from 2,2 to 2,8 ghz with my previous Opteron 150, and Trevormacro had tested on socket 775 ASUS WS mobos with a C2D 8400 if my memories are reliable.

Core power and frequency upgrade affects only " GPU / Cpu collaboration" on geometric computation and T&L as you can see on the bench results. The fillrate depending of Voodoo and the drivers was the same @315 / 571, but geometrics flyes with the C2D.

Notice your gain is very low on Lobby (very depending on texture/ fillrate performances) but good on drago (a mix of geometrics and texture) and very good on car chase (very depending on geometrics).

If you look on C2D (onecore) Passmark vs A64 "Manchester "(onecore) Passmark, you will see the difference for corepower.

In order to compare the efficience of your Agp 3.3 adapter vs my Pci-E 1X adapter, I suggest that you underclock your C2D to 2,0 or 2,2 ghz (for example) to simulate my A64 @2,4 ghz (or adjust your polygon and Vertex score to my values : 5,8 - 2,0 -22,7).

(Notice that I didn't use a 'LOD trick' to boost my geometrics, and run the whole bench in 1 pass with Pci-E locked @100 to give a reliable point of comparison.)

In my opinion, 3DM2001 scores would be the same in this case.
Pci-E-on-Pci adapters are interesting for µATX or mini-ITX configs.




Back to top
« Last Edit: 05.04.14 at 17:33:31 by Steven67 »  
 
IP Logged
 
ultima
God Member
*****
Offline


Always searching

Posts: 876
The Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #35 - 05.04.14 at 18:15:08
 
I have minor setback....the ram I got with the mobo is faulty, I contacted the guy and he will send me new ram, till then, project on hold Sad
Back to top
 

3DFX Playrig:

Aerocool Strike-X Air
SuperMicro H8DAE
Dual Opteron 280 @ 2.4Ghz (4 cores)
4 x 1GB PC3200
3DFX Voodoo5 5500MAC PCI
WD 160GB ATA100/133
Diamond MonsterSound MX300
Windows2000 SP4
 
IP Logged
 
Steven67
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


recent 3dfx enthusiast

Posts: 26
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #36 - 12.04.14 at 14:32:44
 
@ultima : hope your mobo will run soon and you can get the best of it  !

In addition to the D3D score, I run GLIDE API with >100 FPS average 1280*1024 with my mod on A64X2 4200+.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rEvfp437yI&list=UUoiMEZ7WL0u04lOnBMEDR2g


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ultima
God Member
*****
Offline


Always searching

Posts: 876
The Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #37 - 12.04.14 at 15:24:18
 
will be ok, soon I will have the ram, 4 x 1GB DDR400, running in dual channel per cpu

will get my Aerocool Strik-X Air case in a few hours, will build it into the case and show pics Smiley
Back to top
 

3DFX Playrig:

Aerocool Strike-X Air
SuperMicro H8DAE
Dual Opteron 280 @ 2.4Ghz (4 cores)
4 x 1GB PC3200
3DFX Voodoo5 5500MAC PCI
WD 160GB ATA100/133
Diamond MonsterSound MX300
Windows2000 SP4
 
IP Logged
 
ultima
God Member
*****
Offline


Always searching

Posts: 876
The Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #38 - 27.04.14 at 11:55:29
 
finally got the rig up and running.

score is 3132 all on default settings
Back to top
 

3DFX Playrig:

Aerocool Strike-X Air
SuperMicro H8DAE
Dual Opteron 280 @ 2.4Ghz (4 cores)
4 x 1GB PC3200
3DFX Voodoo5 5500MAC PCI
WD 160GB ATA100/133
Diamond MonsterSound MX300
Windows2000 SP4
 
IP Logged
 
Steven67
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


recent 3dfx enthusiast

Posts: 26
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #39 - 01.05.14 at 11:23:40
 
Contribution to 3dfx

"Last rays from a dead star"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07FqU0IpQS0&list=UUoiMEZ7WL0u04lOnBMEDR2g
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
m14radu
God Member
*****
Offline


Take your chance !

Posts: 555
Timisoara, Romania
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #40 - 01.05.14 at 11:49:50
 
great mod Steven !!!  Cheesy
Back to top
 
WWW m14radu  
IP Logged
 
Steven67
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


recent 3dfx enthusiast

Posts: 26
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #41 - 01.05.14 at 14:11:27
 
@ultima :
Could you show us some pictures of this rig ?
The 3dm2001se benchmark is a monothread one, I am not surprised you don't take advantage of your 4 Cpu cores @2,4 Ghz.
High cpu frequency is the key for high 3Dmark scores.
A game like IL2 Sturmovik can be played with Voodoo5
and can be optimized for dual-core.

@mradu :
I am thinking about a new model.
But first, I have to find 50 or 100 euros selling one or two things, to buy the furnitures.
On this occasion, would you like me to put online a 'workblog'
to show the steps of the construction?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Steven67
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


recent 3dfx enthusiast

Posts: 26
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #42 - 04.05.14 at 19:28:09
 
IL2 Sturmovik D3D rendering on my rig.

http://youtu.be/f-qLaGi4cmg
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
m14radu
God Member
*****
Offline


Take your chance !

Posts: 555
Timisoara, Romania
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #43 - 04.05.14 at 21:13:50
 
Hei Steven ! that"s a great ideea !
I can"t wait to see the steps Smiley

Back to top
 
WWW m14radu  
IP Logged
 
ultima
God Member
*****
Offline


Always searching

Posts: 876
The Netherlands
Gender: male
Re: difference in performance for 5500PCI?
Reply #44 - 07.05.14 at 17:56:04
 
Steven67 wrote on 01.05.14 at 14:11:27:
@ultima :
Could you show us some pictures of this rig ?
The 3dm2001se benchmark is a monothread one, I am not surprised you don't take advantage of your 4 Cpu cores @2,4 Ghz.
High cpu frequency is the key for high 3Dmark scores.
A game like IL2 Sturmovik can be played with Voodoo5
and can be optimized for dual-core.


I would rather wait with the pictures untill at least the cable management is done Smiley
24pins extender + 60cm IDE cables coming in tomorrow or friday at the latest, then after they are in place, I will make pictures and post them

see my other thread of what games I played so far on win2k and winXP
Back to top
 

3DFX Playrig:

Aerocool Strike-X Air
SuperMicro H8DAE
Dual Opteron 280 @ 2.4Ghz (4 cores)
4 x 1GB PC3200
3DFX Voodoo5 5500MAC PCI
WD 160GB ATA100/133
Diamond MonsterSound MX300
Windows2000 SP4
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print